For example, from July 1981 to July 1983, a 10% increase in the price of eggs led to an 8% decrease in demand, whereas a 10% decrease in the price led to a 3% increase in demand (Putler, 1992).
In another study, consumers were asked to either build up a basic pizza by adding ingredients (e.g. sausage and pepperoni), or scale down from a fully loaded pizza by removing ingredients. Consistent with loss aversion, consumers in the subtractive condition ended up with pizzas that had significantly more ingredients than those in the additive condition (Levin et al., 2002).
There are numerous ways in which loss aversion can be applied in-store and online. This bias can make it better for your brand and better for shoppers too.
- Frame your offers – ‘save’ messages like ‘extra free’ offers. Shoppers want to hang on to what they already have rather than get some more.
- Focus on what’s left – when shoppers consider your brand, remind them of what they won’t lose, more than what they’ll gain. For example, refill packs, retain the original container and give more product whilst helping shoppers retain more of their money.
- Incite fast-purchasing behaviour – provide shoppers with an indication of not just how much can be gained, but also importantly, how much can be ‘lost’ if they do not choose to buy it now (use scarcity tactics like ‘only 3 left in stock’).
In summary, loss aversion is an important aspect of everyday economic life. The idea suggests that people have a tendency to stick with what they have unless there is a good reason to switch.